Title: Making Humanitarian Action Accountable: A Case Study of Humanitarian Accountability Partnership Certification and the Thailand-Burma Border Consortium
Author: Mac Albert Shaw
Year: 2010
Keywords: HUMANITARIAN ACCOUNTABILITY PARTNERSHIP /, THAILAND BURMA BORDER CONSORTIUM
Theme: Human Development and Human Security
Advisor(s): Naruemon Thabchumpon
The full thesis available here.
Abstract: The development and aid sector has undergone a general professionalization, which lately has paved the way for a number of quality and accountability mechanisms. These are intended to provide evidence of impact and to demonstrate that NGOs support their intended beneficiaries in a justifiable manner. One of the recent initiatives is the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP). It is a self-regulatory NGO-initiative which has a primary focus on certifying member organizations against benchmarked standards for humanitarian action and has lately come to be known as the loudest champion of beneficiary voices. This research critically assesses the HAP certification scheme through a case study of the Thailand Burma Border Consortium (TBBC) who dismissed a suggestion to become HAP-certification on the grounds that it would have no clearly demonstrable benefits. The analysis looks into how the TBBC staff members practice and perceive their current accountability initiatives, the motives for TBBC to dismiss HAP certification at this time, and finally what challenges and opportunities TBBC face in relation to seeking HAP certification. The research shows that HAP certification could strengthen TBBC's legitimacy globally without being at the cost of their local legitimacy. However, if HAP becomes successful enough to become a pre-requisite of funding, it would put pressure on TBBC to re-organize and take on the certification process at a pace that would undermine local accountability. Currently TBBC staff members are divided towards the organization's strategic line. Therefore a deeper discussion at all levels of the organization of what HAP certification might mean for TBBC, would be beneficial to internalize and streamline the strategic position and hereby increase internal legitimacy. Aid and development agencies have undertaken general professionalization efforts, recently paving the way for new, qualitative and verifiable mechanisms. These are aimed at providing evidence of impacts and demonstrating that private organizations justify their expected benefits. One recent innovation is the Humanitarian Aid Auditing Partnership (HAP), a self-regulatory mechanism for non-governmental organizations whose primary objective is to certify member organizations according to established standards for humanitarian work. This concept has been welcomed by many and has been hailed as one of the most influential voices among beneficiaries. This research critically evaluates the HAP accreditation program using the case study of the Thai-Myanmar Border Cooperation Project, which abandoned its recommendation to become an accredited HAP on the grounds of unclear benefits. Data analysis focuses on the work of personnel in the Thai-Myanmar Border Cooperation Project, opinions on the current auditing mechanism, the motivations behind the project's abandonment of HAP accreditation at that time, and finally, to examine the challenges and opportunities the Thai-Myanmar Border Cooperation Project may face when seeking HAP accreditation in the future. The research concludes that ratification of a party to the Humanitarian Aid Inspection Party could enable the Thai-Myanmar border cooperation project to gain international recognition without sacrificing local recognition, which is understandable. However, if the Humanitarian Aid Inspection Party proves sufficiently successful to be a prerequisite for receiving financial assistance, the Thai-Myanmar border cooperation project would be obligated to obtain ratification promptly, potentially leading to local verification. Currently, the personnel involved in the Thai-Myanmar border cooperation project are divided into several factions according to the organization's strategy. Therefore, in-depth discussions at all levels within the organization regarding the potential impact of ratifying the Thai-Myanmar border cooperation project as a party to the Humanitarian Aid Inspection Party could gradually foster a strategic position and potentially lead to increased international legal recognition.
